minimal-run-and-audit
Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself.
仅记录已同意可选统计的用户事件。浏览按账号、Skill 与上海自然日去重;下载按账号、Skill、版本与上海自然日去重,统计仅表示客户端成功交付安装包,不保证包已保存到磁盘。安装仅在客户端成功完成 Skill 写入后记录,并按账号与 Skill 去重 90 天;撤回同意会清理个人去重记录,重新开启后再次安装可能再次计数。“本周”指最近 7 个上海自然日。收藏为当前总数。
Skill 步骤
--- name: minimal-run-and-audit description: Rigor Run skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end-to-end orchestration by itself. --- # minimal-run-and-audit Use this as the Rigor Run skill. The installed slug remains `minimal-run-and-audit` for compatibility. Use the shared operating principles in `../ai-research-reproduction/references/agent-operating-principles.md`; this skill should make run evidence auditable without turning every command into a rigid protocol. ## When to apply - After a reproduction target and setup plan exist. - When the main skill needs execution evidence and normalized outputs. - When a smoke test, documented inference run, documented evaluation run, or other short non-training verification is appropriate. - When the user already knows what command should be attempted and wants execution plus reporting only. ## When not to apply - During initial repo scanning. - When environment or assets are still undefined enough to make execution meaningless. - When the task is a literature lookup rather than repository execution. - When the user is still deciding which reproduction target should count as the main run. ## Clear boundaries - This skill owns normalized reporting for an attempted command. - It may receive execution evidence from the main skill or a thin helper. - It does not choose the overall target on its own. - It does not perform broad paper analysis. - It does not own training startup, resume, or long-running training state. - It should not normalize risky code edits into acceptable practice. - It must not hide changes that alter evaluation, preprocessing, checkpoints, metrics, or other scientific meaning. ## Input expectations - selected reproduction goal - runnable commands or smoke commands - environment and asset assumptions - optional patch metadata ## Output expectations - execution result summary - standardized `repro_outputs/` files - `SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md` for changed scientific meaning and evidence status - `COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md` for README/paper/baseline comparability - clear distinction between verified, partial, and blocked states - `PATCHES.md` when repo files changed ## Notes Use `references/reporting-policy.md`, `../ai-research-reproduction/references/research-rigor-principles.md`, `scripts/run_command.py`, and `scripts/write_outputs.py`.
版本历史
已发布版本会持续保留,可用于校验和恢复。
Imported from lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills@ZIP 467e9239f333c6bd80e64d31301838b4a00182023e59b2360156bec04d417a9e